IS THIS THE REASON WHY MICHAEL JACKSON WAS KILLED...?????
STOCKHOLDERS is the capital of a company or corporation,divided into portions or shares ....IS SONY IN THE BRINK OF BANKRUPTCY????? 1995 Guys sony will not sell their shares of stock if the company is doing good....this an alternate route to revive and survive a company which is sinking......why???because the profit of the company will only go to the company itself but if sony have stockholders, the profit are divided accordingly to sony and its stockholders.....less profit for sony...I`M SURE THIS IS THE REASON WHY THEY SELL THEIR SHARE TO MICHAEL JACKSON A SHARE WORTH 600 MIL $ DURING THAT TIME 1995...OWNING HALF OF SONY !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Since michael was a talent of sony ..... a mega wealthy... and a stock holder... he was persuaded by his entertaiment lawyer branca to joint venture with sony for a bigger profit and new avenues for his atv catalogues ...Aside of being sony stockholder...he became a business partner of sony under the business name sony/atv music publishing......1995 ...guys you`ll notice removing the slash ..it will read sony atv music publishing...so the business name itself already have problem i may say suspicious...
let`s go back to the topic michael as a stockholder....one of the functions of a stockholder is to look after the welfare of its constituents like the royalties paid in its talents...the basis of royalties is the # of copies recorded and distributed and sold......if you will hear closely the video of michael while staging a protest against sony...he also mentioned other black artist that are manipulated and exploited by sony......was not given fair treatment......THIS IS THE REASON WHY SONY GET MAD WITH MICHAEL BECAUSE MICHAEL IS EXPOSING TO THE PUBLIC THAT SONY HAS A MONKEY BUSINESS WITH ITS BLACK TALENTS...
Michael as a talent of sony he did not renew his contract which expires 2001....since 2002 upto now his investments in sony as a stock holder is floating in the air....and the atv music publishing which is now an obsession of sony and aeg and barrack........
I am not convinced and i don`t believe that motolla and michael alone having a dispute wayback 2001 ...sabotaging the invincible album.... last album of michael made for sony.....michael found out that there is no effort to promote his album by sony1.it was not played in radio stations wherein sony pays the station to play it every houror as often it could be.
2.only t v ads were given by sony
3. concerts tour is a very powerful and best effective promotion of an album to make a hit
this things are not done by sony.....so michael was really upset of what sony did......this is there way to fight back on him ....motolla was the center of attraction of that time because he is the ceo and president of sony...but mind you guys...motolla will not move unless he was dictated or mandated by higher officials of sony...launching of an album is not an over night project it is prepared for a long time and money or i should say financial budget is prepared for this event.....and motolla is the front of sony ...he is not the only person who decide in sony.....so to prevent more illegal transactions been exposed to the public..... sony terminated motolla jan.2003 ...to tell the public that they are doing their job....But the public did not know motolla is back with sony 2004 not as ceo but an investor of sony his cassablanca records....so motolla is still affiliated in sony.....
So what is the connection of the murder case of michael to the 2001 sony dispute.....In 2002. Michael wanted to start a new beginning of his career without sony...His talent manager then accepted a documentary film in london by bashir...living with michael jackson...michael trusted and in good faith ...he wants to promote neverland and to show the public world wide its beauty ....and michael says neverland is his totality......So he thought it is good start....to move on......but it did not happen as he expected....martin bashir makes a malicious remarks and defamed the name of michael..misinterpreting the statements of during the interview....my question is this why did the talent manage of michael did not see the editing of the film before it was shown in public ??? so much so to prevent the misinterpretaion of the public but weisner did not do anything to protect michael.......I`m really curious how do this kids get the idea to sue michael wherein michael helped them and they enjoyed in neverland......So if they are truely molested they should have filed a molestation charge right a way not after the showing of the documentary film.....not conincident...because of this michael undergo a police brutality when he was arrested ..he suffered alot...dislocated arms and shoulder that leads him to take more pain killers which was rumored he was addicted to drugs...but i don`t know why klien and other doctors who treated him did not advice him ..to have an executive check up for that matter and if you will scrutinize the line up doctors that treated him...you`ll find out there`s no orthopedist......with this negligence or part of the plan , then michael`s health starts to deteriorate......becomes thinner and thinner each day...no proper nourishment at all.....since michael financial maintenance monthly is 1 mil $...so he have to work and find a way to pay all his obligations...because of the molestation charge his career was halted...he have to bail out ...additioanl cash out...from 2003-2005....his obligations unpaid bills piled up...i`m thinking while reseaching the life of michael ..i ask my self if this a part of the plan...to drain his cash and later ask sony for financial help ...and then sony will buy out his atv publishing .........michael after acquittal 2005, he is in a rush look for people who will help him to start a new again for the 2nd time but to no avail.....he was always redirected to sony...but michael refuses upto the point he was sued for not complying with the contract......For the 3rd time attempt he ask help from the mcmillan londell group of company owned by barrack...that`s where he got aeg and again he was forced to collaborate with sony but still michael refuses and he was killed.....mind you guys michael have bruises in his autopsy report meaning there is struggle before he died.......michael was not even buried or his murder was not even done aeg ...sony and the acting estate administrator are all busy doing the this is it film deal ...they did even goe to the funeral to pay respect to michael.......again this is not conincidental
SO MICHAEL`S DEATH IS NOT COINCIDENTAL..........
No comments:
Post a Comment